The Women’s Rights Movement, 1848–1919

The Women’s Rights Movement, 1848–1919

The Women’s Rights Movement, 1848–1917

The fight for women’s suffrage in the United States began with the women’s rights movement in the mid-nineteenth century. This reform effort encompassed a broad spectrum of goals before its leaders decided to focus first on securing the vote for women. Women’s suffrage leaders, however, disagreed over strategy and tactics: whether to seek the vote at the federal or state level, whether to offer petitions or pursue litigation, and whether to persuade lawmakers individually or to take to the streets. Both the women’s rights and suffrage movements provided political experience for many of the early women pioneers in Congress, but their internal divisions foreshadowed the persistent disagreements among women in Congress that emerged after the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment.

The first attempt to organize a national movement for women’s rights occurred in Seneca Falls, New York, in July 1848. Led by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, a young mother from upstate New York, and the Quaker abolitionist Lucretia Mott, about 300 people—most of whom were women—attended the Seneca Falls Convention to outline a direction for the women’s rights movement.2 Stanton’s call to arms, her “Declaration of Sentiments,” echoed the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal.” In a list of resolutions, Stanton cataloged economic and educational inequities, restrictive laws on marriage and property rights, and social and cultural norms that prevented women from enjoying “all the rights and privileges which belong to them as citizens of the United States.”3 Stanton also demanded for women the “sacred right to the elective franchise”—despite objections from Mott and others who considered this provision too radical. The convention eventually approved the voting rights resolution after abolitionist Frederick Douglass spoke in support of it.4
Like many other women reformers of the era, Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, a Massachusetts teacher, had both been active in the abolitionist cause to end slavery. After first meeting in 1850, Stanton and Anthony forged a lifetime alliance as women’s rights activists. Following the Civil War, they helped build a movement dedicated to women’s suffrage and pushed lawmakers to guarantee their rights during Reconstruction.5

After the emancipation of four million enslaved African Americans, Radical Republicans in Congress proposed a constitutional amendment extending citizenship rights and equal protection under the law to all “persons born or naturalized in the United States.” Whether those rights would include women was unclear, and debates in both houses of Congress focused on defining citizenship. Many Members praised the virtues of “manhood suffrage” and expressed concern about the inclusive language in early drafts of the proposed amendment. Ultimately, the Fourteenth Amendment went as far as to define voting rights as the exclusive privilege of “male citizens”—explicitly adding gender to the Constitution for the first time.6

During the debate over the Fourteenth Amendment, Stanton objected to the use of “that word, ‘male,’” and sent to Congress the first of many petitions supporting women’s suffrage.7 On January 23, 1866, Representative James Brooks of New York read into the official record Stanton’s petition along with an accompanying letter by Anthony. Some Members, including George Washington Julian of Indiana, welcomed the opportunity to enfranchise women. In December 1868, he proposed a constitutional amendment to guarantee citizens the right to vote “without any distinction or discrimination whatever founded on race, colour, or sex.” Julian’s resolution never came to a vote, and even Congressmen who favoured expanding the electorate were not willing to support women’s suffrage.8

In 1869 Congress ignored renewed calls to enshrine women’s suffrage in the Constitution while working to pass an amendment guaranteeing the voting rights of African-American men. The Fifteenth Amendment, ratified by the states in 1870, declared that the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” That year, Hiram Rhodes Revels of Mississippi was elected to the Senate and Joseph Hayne Rainey of South Carolina won election to the House. They were the first African-American lawmakers to serve in Congress.
During the congressional battle over the Fifteenth Amendment, Stanton and Anthony had led a lobbying effort to ensure that voting rights for women were included in the legislation. With increasing frequency, Stanton denounced the extension of voting rights to African-American men while restrictions on women remained. She praised the virtues of “educated white women,” and warned that new immigrants and African Americans were not prepared to exercise the rights of citizens. Stanton’s rhetoric alienated African-American women involved in the fight for women’s rights, and similar ideas about race and gender persisted in the women’s suffrage movement well into the twentieth century.9

In the wake of these setbacks in Congress, women’s rights reformers responded by focusing their message exclusively on the right to vote.10 But the women’s movement fragmented over tactics and broke into two distinct organizations in 1869: the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) and the American Woman Suffrage Association (AWSA). Stanton and Anthony created the NWSA and directed its efforts toward changing federal law. Eventually, the NWSA began a parallel effort to secure the right to vote among the individual states with the hope of starting a ripple effect to win the franchise at the federal level. The NWSA, based in New York, largely relied on its own statewide network. But with Stanton and Anthony giving speeches across the country, the NWSA also drew recruits from all over. Although California Senator Aaron Sargent introduced a women’s suffrage amendment in 1878, the NWSA campaign stalled. Meanwhile, Lucy Stone, a one-time Massachusetts antislavery advocate and a prominent lobbyist for women’s rights, formed the AWSA.11 As former abolitionists, the leaders of the AWSA had mobilized state and local efforts to flood Washington with anti-slavery petitions, and they applied that same tactic after the Civil War to advance women’s rights, mostly at the state level. During the 1880s, the AWSA was better funded and the larger of the two groups, but it had only a regional reach.

When neither group attracted broad public support, suffrage leaders recognized their division had become an impediment to progress. Historian Nancy Woloch described early suffragists’ efforts as “a crusade in political education by women and for women, and for most of its existence, a crusade in search of a constituency.”12 The turning point came in the late 1880s and early 1890s, when the nation experienced a surge of volunteerism among middle-class women—activists in progressive causes, members of women’s clubs and professional societies, temperance advocates, and participants in local civic and charity organizations. The determination of these women to expand their sphere of activities further outside the home helped the suffrage movement go mainstream and provided new momentum for its supporters.

By 1890, seeking to capitalize on their newfound constituency but still without powerful allies in Congress, the two groups united to form the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA). Led initially by Stanton and then by Anthony, the NAWSA drew upon the support of women activists in organizations such as the Women’s Trade Union League, the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union, and the National Consumers League. For the next 20 years, the NAWSA worked as a nonpartisan organization focused on gaining the vote in the states as a precursor to a federal suffrage amendment.13

But the suffrage movement was only so welcoming. In the last two decades of the nineteenth century, civil rights and voting rights came under constant attack in large sections of the country as state policies and court decisions effectively nullified the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. As the system of segregation known as Jim Crow crystallized in the South, African Americans saw protections for their civil and political rights disappear, and few Members of Congress or suffrage advocates were willing to fight for any additional federal safeguards. In an 1898 address to the NAWSA, African-American activist Mary Church Terrell decried these injustices, while remaining hopeful “not only in the prospective enfranchisement of my sex but in the emancipation of my race.” African-American suffragists like Terrell continued to struggle to expand access to the ballot. Their voices, however, could only be heard outside of Congress. In the House and Senate, those voices had fallen silent: from 1901 to 1929 no African-American legislator served in Congress. The promise of the Reconstruction Era—that American democracy could be more just and more representative—was undermined by an organized political movement working to restrict voting rights and exclude millions of Americans from the political process.14
West of the Mississippi River, the new activist climate and the creation of the NAWSA bore fruit. Women had won complete voting rights in Wyoming in 1869, but almost 25 years had elapsed without another victory. After launching the NAWSA in 1890, however, women secured the right to vote in three other western states—Colorado (1893), Utah (1896), and Idaho (1896).

“Why the West first?” remains an enduring puzzle. Some scholars suggest that the West proved to be more progressive in extending the vote to women, in part, in order to attract women westward and to boost the population. Others suggest that women played nontraditional roles on the hardscrabble frontier and were accorded a more equal status by men. Still others find that political expediency by territorial officials played a role. All agree, though, that western women organized themselves effectively to win the vote.15

Between 1910 and 1914, the NAWSA’s intensified advocacy lead to successes at the state level in Washington, California, Arizona, Kansas, and Oregon. In Illinois, future Congresswoman Ruth Hanna McCormick assisted as a lobbyist in Springfield where the state legislature adopted women’s suffrage in 1913, the first such victory in a state east of the Mississippi. Women won the right to vote the next year in Montana, thanks in part to the efforts of another future Congresswoman, Jeannette Rankin.

Despite this momentum, some reformers pushed to quicken the pace of change. In 1913 Alice Paul, a young Quaker activist who participated in the militant British suffrage movement, formed the Congressional Union, later named the National Woman’s Party (NWP), as a rival to the NAWSA. Paul’s group adopted the British tactics of picketing, mass rallies, marches, and civil disobedience to raise awareness and support. The NWP’s more confrontational style attracted a new generation of women to the movement and kept it in the public eye. As part of their campaign, the NWP relentlessly attacked the Democratic administration of President Woodrow Wilson for refusing to support a women’s suffrage amendment.16

In 1915 Carrie Chapman Catt, the veteran suffragist and former NAWSA president, returned to lead the organization. An adept administrator and organizer, Catt authored the “Winning Plan” that called for disciplined and relentless efforts to achieve state referenda on women’s suffrage, especially in nonwestern states.17 Key victories followed in 1917 in Arkansas and New York—the first in the South and East. The 1916 election of Jeannette Rankin of Montana to serve in the 65th Congress (1917–1919) crowned the “Winning Plan” campaign.

Catt’s “Winning Plan” and Paul’s protest campaign coincided with the United States’ entry into World War I.18 Catt and the NAWSA eagerly embraced the war, believing that women would quickly prove themselves in their support for the cause overseas and that extending the franchise at home would be an important step for national readiness and morale. Moreover, leading suffrage advocates insisted the failure to extend the vote to women might impede their participation in the war effort just when they were most needed as workers and volunteers outside the home.

The House Supports Women’s Suffrage, 1917–1919

The election of Jeannette Rankin of Montana to Congress gave the women’s suffrage campaign a major boost. The daughter of a rancher and a schoolteacher, Rankin had studied to be a social worker and joined the suffrage movement while attending the University of Washington where she discovered talents for speaking and organizing. She assisted in the successful campaigns for women’s suffrage in Washington (1910) and in Montana (1914) and worked as a professional lobbyist for the NAWSA. In 1916 Rankin became one of the two Republican nominees for Montana’s two At-Large House seats. During the general election, she ran on a platform that called for a women’s suffrage amendment to the Constitution and against U.S. participation in World War I. Rankin won the second At-Large seat, beating the third-place candidate by 6,000 votes.19

With her victory, Rankin became a national media sensation almost overnight. Many reporters had been covering women congressional candidates in Kansas and Washington who had successful electoral careers at the state level.20 While those candidates lost, Rankin’s victory in Montana had come as a surprise. Rankin’s appearance, personal life, and femininity suddenly became the subject of one article after another. Under the headline “Congresswoman Rankin Real Girl; Likes Nice Gowns and Tidy Hair,” for instance, the Washington Post described Rankin as “a woman who is thoroughly feminine—from her charmingly coiffed swirl of chestnut hair to the small, high and distinctively French heels.”21

Even as the media obsessed over her appearance, Rankin took full advantage of her new fame by giving frequent interviews and writing a semiweekly column for the Hearst newspaper syndicate to focus attention on her policies. She used these opportunities to educate the public about the contributions and capacities of women in politics. Rankin also rarely passed up an opportunity to address civic groups. This attention carried over into the first day of the 65th Congress with a breakfast celebration that forced various feuding factions of the NAWSA to toast Rankin’s swearing in together. Newsreels covered her motorcade to Capitol Hill, and Members and guests applauded when she entered the Chamber. “Before she could sit down she was surrounded by men shaking hands with her,” recalled Ellen M. Slayden, the wife of Representative James Luther Slayden of Texas.22 That day, the first of the new Congress and her first as a Representative, Rankin introduced H.J. Res. 3, the Susan B. Anthony suffrage amendment.23

Her presence in the House had an immediate effect on how Congress approached suffrage. In April 1917, Rankin testified before a Senate committee on woman’s suffrage and worked with her House colleagues to keep women’s voting rights on the legislative agenda.24 The House Judiciary Committee, which had jurisdiction over voting rights, had long been hostile to women’s suffrage. To avoid this obstacle, California Democrat John Edward Raker proposed a new standing committee in the House—the Committee on Woman Suffrage—to consider bills related to women’s voting rights, bypassing Judiciary entirely.25 Rankin testified on behalf of Raker’s proposal in May 1917, and on June 6, the Rules Committee cleared it for House consideration.26

On September 24, the full House took up Raker’s resolution to create the Committee on Woman Suffrage.27 “In this hour, when the life of this Republic is at stake and when American women are responding to the call to duty equally with the men,” Rules Committee Chairman Edward William Pou of North Carolina stated, it was more vital than ever that the House create a suffrage committee.28 “We have as a Member of this body the first woman Representative in the American Congress,” Pou said to applause. “She will not be the last, Mr. Speaker.”29 Rankin spoke in favor of the resolution, arguing that Congress needed to lead on the issue given the formidable obstacles blocking women’s suffrage in the states. “Perhaps it is news to you to know that some of the women of the United States can never be enfranchised except by a Federal amendment,” she said, “for the constitutions of some of the States are such that it is practically impossible to amend them.”30

The measure creating the suffrage committee easily passed, 181 to 107.31 House leaders appointed Raker head of the new panel and designated Rankin as the Ranking Republican—a rare nod to a first-term Member in an institution where committee seniority often dictated legislative power. Opponents of women’s suffrage in the House exploited every opportunity to impede the work of the new committee. In December 1917, for instance, Judiciary Committee Chairman Edwin Yates Webb of North Carolina submitted an alternative voting-rights amendment to undercut what he called “the suffrage forces.”32 Webb’s proposal included a restrictive seven-year ratification window; often Congress imposes no time limit on the ratification of constitutional amendments.33 In something of a compromise, Speaker Champ Clark of Missouri requested that all suffrage measures be reintroduced and referred to Raker’s committee, which would then have to report a new bill by January 10, 1918.34

Raker’s Woman Suffrage Committee wasted no time and began hearings on the voting-rights amendment on January 3, 1918.35 At the hearing, Rankin reinforced the arguments of suffrage advocates and highlighted flaws in the opposition’s logic. When former Senator Joseph Weldon Bailey of Texas testified that the vote should be limited to those able to exercise “all the duties of citizenship,” Rankin replied, “We have men in the United States Senate who cannot serve in the Army, and yet they make splendid Senators.”36


2David Roediger, Seizing Freedom: Slave Emancipation and Liberty for All (New York: Verso, 2014): 129; David W. Blight, Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2018): 196. Standard biographies of these two women include Lois W. Banner, Elizabeth Cady Stanton: A Radical for Women’s Rights (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1980); and Margaret Hope Bacon, Valiant Friend: The Life of Lucretia Mott (New York: Walker Publishing, 1980).

3“The Declaration of Sentiments,” Seneca Falls Convention, 1848. For more on the convention at Seneca Falls, its participants, and the larger movement it spawned, see Ellen DuBois, Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women’s Movement in the U.S., 1848–1869 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978).

4Laura E. Free, Suffrage Reconstructed: Gender, Race, and Voting Rights in the Civil War Era (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2015): 43; History of Woman Suffrage, vol. 1 (1848–1861), ed. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and Matilda Joslyn Gage (New York: Fowler and Wells, 1881): 70–73, For an overview of the period from the Civil War through 1920, see Nancy Woloch, Women and the American Experience, 2nd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994): especially 326–363.

5Sylvia D. Hoffert, When Hens Crow: The Women’s Rights Movement in Antebellum America (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995): 75–90; Free, Suffrage Reconstructed: 43.

6On the origins and passage of the Reconstruction Amendments in general, see David E. Kyvig, Explicit and Authentic Acts: Amending the U.S. Constitution, 1776–1995 (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1996), and Richard Bernstein with Jerome Agel, Amending America: If We Love the Constitution So Much, Why Do We Keep Trying to Change It? (New York: Times Books, 1993).

7Free, Suffrage Reconstructed: 105.

8Free, Suffrage Reconstructed: 115; Blight, Frederick Douglass: 488.

9Roediger, Seizing Freedom: 153, 156.

10See, for example, DuBois, Feminism and Suffrage: 21–52; Nancy Woloch, Women and the American Experience, 5th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011): 327.

11For more on Lucy Stone, see Andrea Moore Kerr, Lucy Stone: Speaking Out for Equality (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1992).

12Woloch, Women and the American Experience: 329–336.

13Woloch, Women and the American Experience: 334–335; Roediger, Seizing Freedom: 334–335.

14Mary Church Terrell, The Progress of the Coloured Women (Washington, DC: Smith Brothers, Printers, 1898),

15See, for instance, Beverly Beeton, Women Vote in the West: The Woman Suffrage Movement 1869–1896 (New York: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1986); David E. Kyvig, Explicit and Authentic Acts: 227; and the Women of the West Museum, “‘This shall be the land for women’: The Struggle for Western Women’s Suffrage, 1860–1920,” /index.html.

16For more on Alice Paul and the National Woman’s Party, see Inez Haynes Gillmore, Up Hill with Banners Flying (Penobscott, ME: Traversity Press, 1964).

17For a biography of Catt, see Robert Booth Fowler, Carrie Catt: Feminist Politician (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1986); Kyvig, Explicit and Authentic Acts: 233.

18Woloch, Women and the American Experience: 353.